1992 Chrysler TC vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo C70 (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler TC. (175 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler TC.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C70 (351 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler TC. (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler TC.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler TC | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | TC | C70 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 351 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 93.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2670 mm |