1992 Chrysler TC vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler TC. (175 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler TC.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chrysler TC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (540 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler TC. (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler TC.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler TC | 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | TC | ML |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 540 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2920 mm |