1992 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler Voyager (116 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 30 kg more than 1992 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Chrysler Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler Voyager. (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Chrysler Voyager | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | Voyager | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1760 kg |
