1992 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford C-Max (150 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler Voyager. (116 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 180 kg more than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (270 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler Voyager. (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Voyager | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Voyager | C-Max |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1684 mm |