1992 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2011 Renault Clio
To start off, 2011 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chrysler Voyager (116 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2011 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler Voyager (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Chrysler Voyager | 2011 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Voyager | Clio |
Year Released | 1992 | 2011 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |