1992 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2013 Lotus Evora

To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (345 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler Voyager. (116 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 290 kg more than 2013 Lotus Evora.

Because 2013 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (400 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chrysler Voyager. (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chrysler Voyager.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Chrysler Voyager 2013 Lotus Evora
Make Chrysler Lotus
Model Voyager Evora
Year Released 1992 2013
Body Type Minivan Coupe
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 116 HP 345 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 250 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1730 kg 1440 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4361 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 2047 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1229 mm