1992 Citroen AX vs. 2008 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2008 Dodge Dakota is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Citroen AX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Citroen AX would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1992 Citroen AX. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1992 Citroen AX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 969 kg more than 1992 Citroen AX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Citroen AX. (73 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2008 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Citroen AX.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Citroen AX | 2008 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | AX | Dakota |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 953 cc | 3701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 722 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 83 L |