1992 Citroen AX vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Citroen AX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Citroen AX would be higher. At 2,987 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1688 kg more than 1992 Citroen AX.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Citroen AX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Citroen AX. (73 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Citroen AX. 2008 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1992 Citroen AX has manual transmission. 1992 Citroen AX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Citroen AX | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | AX | Commander |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 953 cc | 2987 cc |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 73 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 722 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 2270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |