1992 Citroen C 15 vs. 2010 Mazda 2

To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 1,347 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 2 (85 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1992 Citroen C 15. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1992 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 2 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1992 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 2 (122 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Citroen C 15.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Citroen C 15 2010 Mazda 2
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C 15 2
Year Released 1992 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 954 cc 1347 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 44 HP 85 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 122 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 845 kg 955 kg
Vehicle Length 4010 mm 3890 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1820 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2500 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 43 L