1992 Citroen ZX vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Citroen ZX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Citroen ZX (150 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Citroen ZX should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Citroen ZX weights approximately 500 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Citroen ZX | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Citroen | MCC |
| Model | ZX | Smart |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 53 HP |
| Top Speed | 215 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1460 mm |
