1992 Citroen ZX vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1992 Citroen ZX. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1992 Citroen ZX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Citroen ZX. (183 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Citroen ZX. 2000 Oldsmobile SS has automatic transmission and 1992 Citroen ZX has manual transmission. 1992 Citroen ZX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile SS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Citroen ZX | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Citroen | Oldsmobile |
| Model | ZX | SS |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4090 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1900 mm |
