1992 Citroen ZX vs. 2005 Ford F-150
To start off, 2005 Ford F-150 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford F-150 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1992 Citroen ZX. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1992 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford F-150 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1992 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford F-150 (325 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Citroen ZX. (196 Nm). This means 2005 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Citroen ZX | 2005 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | ZX | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1905 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 196 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 21.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 5370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 98 L |
