1992 Citroen ZX vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Citroen ZX would be higher. Both 1992 Citroen ZX and 2005 Nissan Hardbody are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1992 Citroen ZX. (121 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1992 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 216 kg more than 1992 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Citroen ZX (176 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1992 Citroen ZX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Citroen ZX | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | ZX | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 121 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1320 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 60 L |