1992 Citroen ZX vs. 2009 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2009 Nissan Titan is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Citroen ZX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Citroen ZX would be higher. At 5,598 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Titan (313 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1992 Citroen ZX. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1992 Citroen ZX.
Because 2009 Nissan Titan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Nissan Titan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Citroen ZX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Titan (385 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Citroen ZX. (183 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Citroen ZX. 2009 Nissan Titan has automatic transmission and 1992 Citroen ZX has manual transmission. 1992 Citroen ZX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Titan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Citroen ZX | 2009 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | ZX | Titan |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1905 cc | 5598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 313 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 385 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.4:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2030 mm |