1992 Daihatsu Charade vs. 2010 Holden Calais
To start off, 2010 Holden Calais is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Daihatsu Charade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Daihatsu Charade would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 293 more horse power than 1992 Daihatsu Charade. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1992 Daihatsu Charade.
Because 2010 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Daihatsu Charade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 454 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Daihatsu Charade. (76 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Daihatsu Charade.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Daihatsu Charade | 2010 Holden Calais | |
Make | Daihatsu | Holden |
Model | Charade | Calais |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 992 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 76 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |