1992 Daihatsu Opti vs. 1963 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1992 Daihatsu Opti is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Toyota Crown (80 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Toyota Crown weights approximately 465 kg more than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Daihatsu Opti, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Toyota Crown (152 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. (107 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1963 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Daihatsu Opti.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Daihatsu Opti | 1963 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Daihatsu | Toyota |
Model | Opti | Crown |
Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 1897 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 107 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 61 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56.4 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.2:1 | 22.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 75 L |