1992 Daihatsu Opti vs. 1999 Ford Falcon

To start off, 1999 Ford Falcon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Daihatsu Opti. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Daihatsu Opti would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. (56 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Falcon weights approximately 745 kg more than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Daihatsu Opti, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (366 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. (64 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Daihatsu Opti.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Daihatsu Opti 1999 Ford Falcon
Make Daihatsu Ford
Model Opti Falcon
Year Released 1992 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 659 cc 3984 cc
Engine Cylinders 3 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 56 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 7600 RPM 4900 RPM
Torque 64 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 68 mm 92.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 60.5 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 760 kg 1505 kg
Vehicle Length 3400 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1480 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 62 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]