1992 Daihatsu Opti vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Daihatsu Opti. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Daihatsu Opti would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 978 kg more than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Daihatsu Opti, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Daihatsu Opti. (107 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Daihatsu Opti.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Daihatsu Opti 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Daihatsu Cadillac
Model Opti CTS
Year Released 1992 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 659 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 63 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 107 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 61 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 56.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.2:1 11.3
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 790 kg 1768 kg
Vehicle Length 3400 mm 4788 mm
Vehicle Width 1480 mm 1882 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1442 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]