1992 Dodge Caravan vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Caravan would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Dodge Caravan (100 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Dodge Caravan should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Dodge Caravan weights approximately 440 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Dodge Caravan (183 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1992 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Dodge Caravan | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Dodge | MCC |
| Model | Caravan | Smart |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 73 HP |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2510 mm |
