1992 Dodge Caravan vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Caravan would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 315 kg more than 1992 Dodge Caravan.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Dodge Caravan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Dodge Caravan | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Caravan | Ranger |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3010 mm |