1992 Dodge Caravan vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Caravan would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1992 Dodge Caravan. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1992 Dodge Caravan.
Because 2008 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Dodge Caravan (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1992 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Dodge Caravan | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Caravan | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2710 mm |