1992 Dodge Colt vs. 1951 Morris Oxford
To start off, 1992 Dodge Colt is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 1,475 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Morris Oxford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Dodge Colt (92 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1951 Morris Oxford. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 1951 Morris Oxford.
Because 1951 Morris Oxford is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Morris Oxford. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Dodge Colt (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Morris Oxford. (88 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1992 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Dodge Colt | 1951 Morris Oxford | |
Make | Dodge | Morris |
Model | Colt | Oxford |
Year Released | 1992 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1475 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2470 mm |