1992 Dodge Colt vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1992 Dodge Colt is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1992 Dodge Colt. (92 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 116 kg more than 1992 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Dodge Colt | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Colt | Mustang |
Year Released | 1992 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2750 mm |