1992 Dodge Colt vs. 2001 Suzuki Lapin
To start off, 2001 Suzuki Lapin is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Dodge Colt (92 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki Lapin. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki Lapin. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Dodge Colt weights approximately 120 kg more than 2001 Suzuki Lapin. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Dodge Colt (123 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki Lapin. (108 Nm). This means 1992 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki Lapin.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Dodge Colt | 2001 Suzuki Lapin | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Colt | Lapin |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2370 mm |
