1992 Dodge Colt vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1992 Dodge Colt. (92 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1992 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 20 kg more than 1992 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (146 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Dodge Colt | 2004 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Colt | Colt |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2510 mm |