1992 Dodge Colt vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2008 Jeep Commander is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 2,985 cc, 2008 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1900 kg more than 1992 Dodge Colt.
Because 2008 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Dodge Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Dodge Colt | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Dodge | Jeep |
| Model | Colt | Commander |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 2985 cc |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 510 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 2900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2790 mm |
