1992 Dodge Colt vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1992 Dodge Colt. (92 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1992 Dodge Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (320 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Dodge Colt | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Colt | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2685 mm |
