1992 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 2000 Plymouth Prowler
To start off, 2000 Plymouth Prowler is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 255 kg more than 2000 Plymouth Prowler.
Because 2000 Plymouth Prowler is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Plymouth Prowler. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Plymouth Prowler (610 Nm) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan. (235 Nm). This means 2000 Plymouth Prowler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Dodge Grand Caravan | 2000 Plymouth Prowler | |
Make | Dodge | Plymouth |
Model | Grand Caravan | Prowler |
Year Released | 1992 | 2000 |
Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2971 cc | 3507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 610 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2880 mm |