1992 Dodge Monaco vs. 2005 Lada Oka
To start off, 2005 Lada Oka is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Monaco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Monaco would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Dodge Monaco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Dodge Monaco (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2005 Lada Oka. (30 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Dodge Monaco should accelerate faster than 2005 Lada Oka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Dodge Monaco weights approximately 719 kg more than 2005 Lada Oka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Dodge Monaco (232 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lada Oka. (46 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1992 Dodge Monaco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lada Oka.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Dodge Monaco | 2005 Lada Oka | |
Make | Dodge | Lada |
Model | Monaco | Oka |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2975 cc | 644 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 46 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 636 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2190 mm |