1992 Donkervoort D8 vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Donkervoort D8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Donkervoort D8 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Donkervoort D8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Donkervoort D8 (138 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Donkervoort D8 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 90 kg more than 1992 Donkervoort D8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Donkervoort D8 (170 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1992 Donkervoort D8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Donkervoort D8 | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Donkervoort | MCC |
| Model | D8 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5250 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 654 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 1810 mm |
