1992 Donkervoort D8 vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Donkervoort D8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Donkervoort D8 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Donkervoort D8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Donkervoort D8 (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Donkervoort D8 should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Because 1992 Donkervoort D8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Donkervoort D8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Donkervoort D8 (291 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 5008. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1992 Donkervoort D8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 5008.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Donkervoort D8 | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Donkervoort | Peugeot |
Model | D8 | 5008 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1835 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2735 mm |