1992 Donkervoort S8 vs. 2004 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2004 Smart ForTwo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Donkervoort S8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Donkervoort S8 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Donkervoort S8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Donkervoort S8 (214 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Smart ForTwo. (95 Nm). This means 1992 Donkervoort S8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Smart ForTwo. 1992 Donkervoort S8 has automatic transmission and 2004 Smart ForTwo has manual transmission. 2004 Smart ForTwo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1992 Donkervoort S8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Donkervoort S8 | 2004 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Donkervoort | Smart |
Model | S8 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1992 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 214 Nm | 95 Nm |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 135 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3410 mm | 2510 mm |