1992 Eagle Talon vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1992 Eagle Talon is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 380 kg more than 1992 Eagle Talon.
Because 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Eagle Talon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Eagle Talon | 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Eagle | Oldsmobile |
Model | Talon | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1992 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2960 mm |