1992 Eagle Talon vs. 1999 Ford 021 C
To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Eagle Talon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Eagle Talon would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Eagle Talon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Eagle Talon (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Eagle Talon should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford 021 C weights approximately 68 kg more than 1992 Eagle Talon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Eagle Talon (169 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford 021 C. (146 Nm). This means 1992 Eagle Talon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford 021 C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Eagle Talon | 1999 Ford 021 C | |
| Make | Eagle | Ford |
| Model | Talon | 021 C |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2490 mm |
