1992 Ferrari F40 vs. 2005 Renault Megane

To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ferrari F40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ferrari F40 would be higher. At 2,934 cc (8 cylinders), 1992 Ferrari F40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ferrari F40 (472 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 339 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ferrari F40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 600 kg more than 1992 Ferrari F40.

Because 1992 Ferrari F40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ferrari F40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ferrari F40 (575 Nm) has 470 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1992 Ferrari F40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications: