1992 Fiat 126 vs. 2008 Skoda Roomster
To start off, 2008 Skoda Roomster is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Fiat 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Fiat 126 would be higher. At 1,422 cc (3 cylinders), 2008 Skoda Roomster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Skoda Roomster (50 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1992 Fiat 126. (26 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Skoda Roomster should accelerate faster than 1992 Fiat 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Skoda Roomster weights approximately 662 kg more than 1992 Fiat 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Fiat 126 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Fiat 126. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Skoda Roomster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Skoda Roomster (155 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Fiat 126. (49 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Skoda Roomster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Fiat 126.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Fiat 126 | 2008 Skoda Roomster | |
| Make | Fiat | Skoda |
| Model | 126 | Roomster |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 703 cc | 1422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 49 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 95.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 19.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 648 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 5.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |
