1992 Fiat Panda vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore

To start off, 1992 Fiat Panda is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1992 Fiat Panda. (38 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 1992 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 961 kg more than 1992 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Hudson Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Hudson Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1992 Fiat Panda 1949 Hudson Commodore
Make Fiat Hudson
Model Panda Commodore
Year Released 1992 1949
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 899 cc 4166 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 38 HP 128 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65 mm 76.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 67.7 mm 114.3 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 695 kg 1656 kg
Vehicle Length 3420 mm 5280 mm
Vehicle Width 1500 mm 1960 mm
Wheelbase Size 2170 mm 3160 mm