1992 Fiat Tempra vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1992 Fiat Tempra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1992 Fiat Tempra.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Fiat Tempra | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Fiat | Lincoln |
| Model | Tempra | Continental |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 284 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2000 mm |
