1992 Fiat Tempra vs. 1963 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1992 Fiat Tempra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Fiat Tempra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Fiat Tempra weights approximately 870 kg more than 1963 Mazda R 360.
Because 1963 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Fiat Tempra | 1963 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Tempra | R 360 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1963 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 356 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 16 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |