1992 Fiat Tempra vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 1992 Fiat Tempra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Fiat Tempra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Fiat Tempra weights approximately 240 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120.
Because 1968 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Fiat Tempra | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Tempra | 120 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |