1992 Fiat Tempra vs. 1977 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1992 Fiat Tempra is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Fiat Tempra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Fiat Tempra weights approximately 398 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1977 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Fiat Tempra | 1977 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Tempra | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1992 | 1977 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |