1992 Fiat Tempra vs. 1980 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1992 Fiat Tempra is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Fiat Tempra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Fiat Tempra weights approximately 290 kg more than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Because 1980 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Fiat Tempra | 1980 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Fiat | Zastava |
| Model | Tempra | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
