1992 Fiat Tempra vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Fiat Tempra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Fiat Tempra would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Fiat Tempra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 95 kg more than 1992 Fiat Tempra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 1992 Fiat Tempra has manual transmission. 1992 Fiat Tempra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Fiat Tempra | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Tempra | CU-X |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1345 kg |