1992 Fiat Uno vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Fiat Uno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Fiat Uno would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (320 HP) has 276 more horse power than 1992 Fiat Uno. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1992 Fiat Uno.
Because 2010 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Fiat Uno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1992 Fiat Uno has manual transmission. 1992 Fiat Uno will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Fiat Uno | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | Uno | STS |
Year Released | 1992 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 903 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 320 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2957 mm |