1992 Fiat Vivace vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (257 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1992 Fiat Vivace. (64 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1992 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S60 weights approximately 729 kg more than 1992 Fiat Vivace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S60 (350 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Fiat Vivace | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Vivace | S60 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 257 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1539 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2760 mm |