1992 Fiat Vivace vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1992 Fiat Vivace. (64 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1992 Fiat Vivace.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Fiat Vivace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Fiat Vivace. (102 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Fiat Vivace.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Fiat Vivace | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Vivace | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1992 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 351 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2760 mm |