1992 Ford Aerostar vs. 1981 Mazda 929
To start off, 1992 Ford Aerostar is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Aerostar (143 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1981 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1981 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 260 kg more than 1981 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Aerostar (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Aerostar | 1981 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Aerostar | 929 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2977 cc | 1969 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 98 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2620 mm |
