1992 Ford Aerostar vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Aerostar (143 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 760 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Aerostar | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | Aerostar | Smart |
| Year Released | 1992 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2977 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
