1992 Ford Aerostar vs. 2001 Opel Omega
To start off, 2001 Opel Omega is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Aerostar (143 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2001 Opel Omega. (101 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2001 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 112 kg more than 2001 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (447 Nm) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Aerostar. (224 Nm). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Ford Aerostar | 2001 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Aerostar | Omega |
Year Released | 1992 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 447 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 99.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.7 mm | 91.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1298 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2840 mm |