1992 Ford Aerostar vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 192 more horse power than 1992 Ford Aerostar. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Aerostar.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Aerostar. (224 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Ford Aerostar | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Aerostar | RS3 |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2977 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
